The fate of Hardik Pandya and KL Rahul hangs in thin air as the 2 contributors of the Committee of directors are once more at loggerheads over the method to conclude the difficulty. Both Hardik and Rahul on Monday tendered "unconditional" apologies for their sexist comments at some point of a television chat show.

however, as per a document in Cricketnext, one half of of CoA, Vinod Rai, is in favour of appointing an ad-hoc Ombudsman, as cautioned by way of BCCI prison advisors, to miss Pandya-Rahul sexism episode. Rai has instructed BCCI CEO Rahul Johri to carry out a preliminary inquiry but Diana Edulji desires in any other case. Edulji, who bureaucracy the the alternative 1/2 of the CoA, wants a permanent appointee to probe the case.

On 17 January, SC will soak up Cricket association of Bihar’s petition approximately the operating of the CoA and BCCI, and Edulji, in a mail to Rai, demanded the apex court be knowledgeable about the scenario. "The supreme courtroom listening to is scheduled for 17 January, allow the courtroom be knowledgeable about this situation and allow an Ombudsman be appointed by way of the court instead of taking a incorrect step of appointing the advert hoc ombudsman, which is not as consistent with the new charter," she wrote.

Edulji fears a "cover-up" inside the controversy, prompted with the aid of Pandya and Rahul's a good deal-condemned statements on 'Koffee with Karan'.

BCCI’s prison advisors, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, had written to Edulji about placing an ad-hoc Ombudsman in a mail sent on 10 January.

Rai wrote back to Edulji that BCCI ought to no longer be within the commercial enterprise of ruining young careers and that "your committee" will run the chance of being "decide, jury, and executioner".

"Please notice that because you do now not need to observe the thought of legal to have an ‘ad hoc ombudsman’. Your suggestion runs the chance of your committee being ‘judge, jury and executioner’. Please go in advance and take it ahead. I'm able to maintain away and leave it to you.

The CEO must satisfy his responsibility as per Rule forty one(C) and behavior the inquiry after receiving the reason of the gamers. He have to make sure that the norms of herbal justice are fulfilled," Rai wrote to Edulji.

"BCCI isn't always inside the commercial enterprise of finishing young careers. Please be confident that the preference to behavior the inquiry isn't a desire to 'cover up'. The hobby of cricket in India needs to be kept in mind," wrote Rai as mentioned by PTI.

He also wrote that advert-hoc Ombudsman will not cowl-up the case. He wrote, "Please be confident that the choice to conduct the inquiry isn't a choice to 'cowl up'. The hobby of cricket in India must be saved in thoughts. The off the ground act of the gamers became deplorable. It become crass as I said right now after analyzing the comments."

The 10th CoA report without a doubt indicates that as in keeping with the newly registered charter, BCCI calls for the appointment of an Ombudsman for the purpose to presenting an independent dispute decision mechanism.

“The newly registered constitution of BCCI calls for the appointment of an Ombudsman at the Annual general assembly for the cause of providing an independent dispute resolution mechanism. It's far essential that the primary Ombudsman be appointed on the earliest in order that the provisions referring to independent dispute resolution mechanism underneath the newly registered charter may be implemented right now,” study the document.

it's far to be stated that no unique fashionable meeting has been held to hire an Ombudsman.

In some other development, acting president CK Khanna received requisitions from 10 nation devices disturbing a unique preferred assembly on the earliest.

As in line with the brand new constitution, the secretary — in this case, the performing secretary — can call an SGM on 21 days' word but if it has to be an Emergent SGM inside 10 days, the board president (performing president) in this situation has to convene the meeting.

"it'll be interesting what name Khanna will take. If I consider, he as soon as didn't sign the minutes of SGM fearing that it would be in violation of best court orders. On every other event, he didn't even attend an SGM," a nation unit member, who become gift throughout each the conferences, stated.

"there may be a opportunity that Khanna may also educate Amitabh Chaudhary to call a normal SGM with 21 days' notice which a secretary is authorized to," he brought.

With inputs from PTI